Skip to content

Citi, Wells Fargo, and Wachovia

Citigroup said Thursday that it was walking away from talks to divvy up Wachovia Corp.’s assets with Wells Fargo adding that it would seek damages from the other two banks but not seek to bar a Wells Fargo takeover of Wachovia from proceeding.

Dramatic differences in transaction structures and views of risks made mutually acceptable agreements impossible Citi said in a statement.

Wells Fargo and the Federal Reserve were negotiating over the future of Wachovia a regional bank hobbled by the credit crisis but with a valuable network of branches.

Citigroup preliminarily agreed at the beginning of last week to buy Wachovia’s banking assets with partial government assistance and supported Wachovia last week while they hammered out final details. But Wells Fargo last Friday said it had signed an agreement to buy all of Wachovia including its asset management and retail brokerage arms.

Wells and Citigroup fought in court last weekend but Monday agreed to suspend litigation—a suspension that had been due to expire Wednesday at noon.

In a statement

the banks said the deadline was extended in consultation with the Federal Reserve to Friday

Oct. 10

at 8 a.m.

But late Thursday

Citi said it believes it has strong legal claims against Wachovia and Wells Fargo for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract.

Citigroup plans to pursue these damage claims vigorously on behalf of its shareholders

Citi said.

Citigroup has decided not to ask that the Wells Fargo-Wachovia merger be enjoined.

Wells Fargo has managed to remain profitable during the credit crunch

while Citi is looking to turn around its business after posting about $60 billion in write-downs and losses during the year.

Citi Chief Executive Vikram Pandit said:

We did not seek the Wachovia transaction

Wachovia brought it to us. Our focus remains on capitalizing on our global strengths.